Read Сryptocurrency News



Texas’ ‘Worst Than BitLicense’ Crypto-Bill is Dead on Arrival

Texas’ ‘Worst Than BitLicense’ Crypto-Bill is Dead on Arrival
Copyright on text and image: Bitcoinist.com
Earlier this week, the cryptocurrency community reacted with abject horror towards Texas’ proposed ‘Verified Identity Digital Currency’ bill. Well, apparently it was a lot of worry over nothing, as the bill is allegedly dead in the water.


Indecent Proposal


The furor started on Monday, when the proposed bill, HB4371, first came to light. The bill declared that:

Before accepting payment by a digital currency, a person must verify the identity of the person sending payment.

However, this did not apply if the payment was in a ‘Verified Identity Digital Currency’ as defined by the bill. Furthermore, “This state may not use a digital currency that is not a verified identity digital currency.”

The definition of such a currency was rather vague and seemed to willfully ignore a key point of cryptocurrency.


Why Oh Wyoming


In a bid to confront the specific lawmakers involved, House Representative, Tyler Lindholm, and Caitlin Long went to the Capitol. Both Lindholm and Long have been instrumental in pushing through much lauded blockchain-friendly bills in the state of Wyoming.

The intention was to talk to the sponsor of the bill, Republican senator Phil Stephenson. Perhaps that would help him to understand the intricacies of cryptocurrency and why his bill would be so damaging. Long described the bill as “worse than [New York’s] BitLicense” legislation.

Click to view this tweet on Twitter



The two, unfortunately, didn’t get to meet Stephenson, but Long posted a video, imploring Texas residents to contact their representative to suppress the bill. While she expressed a belief that the bill would damage the industry, Lindholm was happy to welcome Texas-based blockchain companies to relocate to Wyoming.


Much Ado About Nothing


In a development yesterday, blockchain-entrepreneur and CEO of Mock-it Esports, tweeted regarding a conversation he had with a Texas House Director. Apparently, he had been informed that the bill was dead on arrival, and had been asked to collate a list of points which should be in the regulation.

Few things. That KYC bill is DOA. No worries Secondly, they want me to give them a bullet list of things we would want to see in regulation.

In the comments of his tweet (which Long also retweeted), were a number of suggestions of varying feasibility. One, in particular, showed the general sentiment towards Long and Lindholm’s efforts in Wyoming.

Ctrl-C Ctrl-V Wyoming Blockchain bills.

Can’t really argue with that.

Is the defeat of Texas’ crypto-bill a positive sign for the industry? Share your thoughts below!

Images courtesy of Shutterstock



This article was automatically published by our aggregator and may not contain important advanced information, such as links, images, user tweets and much more. Also, we inform you that the project IntoCryptoNews (ICN Aggregator) - is not the author of this article and may not support the author's opinion of the original article. We strongly recommend that you read the original article on the site:

Bitcoinist.com




Add comment




TOP CRYPTO NEWS TODAY


Latest Video News


Price Analysis from CryptoGlobe.com


Popular For The Week


latest Press Releases